home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: newsfeeds.ans.net!interaccess!usenet
- From: "Thaddeus L. Olczyk" <Polczyk@interaccess.com>
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: C++ vs Delphi 2.0
- Date: 27 Mar 1996 04:08:06 GMT
- Organization: InterAccess, Chicagoland's Full-Service Internet Provider
- Message-ID: <4jaev6$f8b@nntp.interaccess.com>
- References: <825673272.2083@axiombc.demon.co.uk> <4hmop6$snh@cdshub.cdc.com> <4ims71$oh3@hawk.pix.za> <3152304b.5915048@news.newcastle.edu.au> <4j2u9o$s0n@nntp.interaccess.com> <4j7r2e$2ur@news4.digex.net>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: d116.nwchi.interaccess.com
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.22KIT (Windows; U; 16bit)
-
- ell@access4.digex.net (Ell) wrote:
- >Thaddeus L. Olczyk (Polczyk@interaccess.com) wrote:
- >:..
- >: One of the major selling points of Delphi I hear from most Delphi
- >: programmers is "isn't it great I can write this application with
- >: virtually no code".
- >
- >That should be the first inclination regardless of language, to "'write
- >this application with virtually no code'". Taking that to mean one can
-
- And I thought that things like:
-
- writing robust applications which do what they are supposed to do,
- a solid architecture,
- relatively fast applications ( where it doesn't take more then a year
- to do the taxes for example),
- relatively leak free applications ( say less then 10K/sec ),
- etc.
-
- but now that ou've pointed it out tome I see the error of my ways
- an shall henceforth strive to put 'writing less code' at the top
- of my criteria for writing good code.
- -------------
- Thaddeus L. Olczyk
-
-
-